iPhone vs. Android: Which is better for you?

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Pixel 9 Pro XL.
(Image credit: Future)

The iPhone vs Android debate is the real battle of the titans, at least when it comes to smartphones. So which is the true champ when it comes to mobile platforms?

We have some insight on that question. We test a lot of phones, iPhones and Android devices alike, so we have a good sense of where the different phones shine and falter. From 200-photo face-offs to test the cameras to battery testing to see how long each phone lasts, we have unique insight into which are the best phones — and what software platform they belong to.

As a result, we’ve gathered all the information at our disposal to compare iPhones with Android devices. Given the wide variety of Android devices, we’ll focus our comparisons here on the best Android phones, including flagships from Samsung and Google.

So let’s consider the iPhone vs Android differences, both the positives and the negatives, to see which is best for you.

iPhone vs Android: Hardware

Natural language search on an iPhone 15 Pro running iOS 18.1

(Image credit: Future)

When it comes to hardware, there isn’t that much difference between the best iPhones and the best Android phones. Depending on the price, you’re going to get some fantastic cameras, a gorgeous screen and more, especially if you home in on the top flagships. That said, Android offers a lot more options when it comes to design and price.

As a rule, Android devices tend to have more memory than the iPhone. Apple never discloses just how much RAM it includes on iPhones, but iPhone 16 teardowns reveal that it’s 8GB across all four models devices can range from 8GB to 32GB at varying prices. While the average user is never going to need 32GB, gamers will love it as it allows their phones to play some of the best games seamlessly.

I should also note that fixing an iPhone tends to be a lot simpler, mainly because Apple will only allow official parts. Apple has also been working to make it possible to fix the iPhone 16 in the comfort of your own home. Android devices are fixable, and getting parts can be much easier (and cheaper), but the quality variance can trip you up if you’re not careful.

Apple iPhone 16 held in the hand.

(Image credit: Future)

iPhone vs Android: Software

What sets the iPhones apart?

Because Apple controls both the software and hardware for its phones, it’s able to add features in iOS that work across its devices — not just iPhones, but Macs, Apple Watches and iPads as well. Essentially, all of your Apple devices can work together and share data: You can save a project on your phone and then easily move it over to your Mac or iPad. This interconnectivity has only been improved with iOS 18, especially as users can easily put their phone home screen on their Mac’s screen, and can drag and drop files and check their messages.

Apple also benefits from a lack of bloatware on its phones. Yes, there are built-in apps, but very little of the preloaded cruft that you’ll find on some Android phones. iOS also tends to be more secure, though its popularity has made it a more enticing target in recent years for hackers and bad actors.

That said, there are some downsides to iOS. iPhone apps tend to cost more than their Android counterparts, with many of the best iPhone games locked behind the Apple Arcade paywall. Apple also tends to lock apps out of certain features like NFC, making them much less effective. Finally, there’s no real option on where you get apps, at least in the U.S., where you’re limited to Apple’s own App Store. In Europe, you’ve got a bit more flexibility thanks to regulatory intervention.

Hand holding a phone with photo on the display

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Where Android stands out

One of Android’s strongest suits is its flexibility, which stems from the number of devices that run on the software. Each one has its own Android skin, so you can expect a somewhat unique experience based on which phone you buy.In addition, you can choose from a number third-party options that change the user experience. For instance, I was able to download a Persona 5 style for my messages app, something I couldn’t do on the iPhone.

There’s also an argument that Android devices often see more innovation than Apple devices, partially because of how open the Android source code is. This allows developers more freedom to really experiment. While Google has its own app store with the Play Store, you’re not limited to finding apps there. As a result, it is much easier to find things like emulators on Android devices compared to the limited options on iPhone.

Android also offers a lot of interconnectivity with Google’s software services, including Photos and Google Drive. While the experience might not be quite as seamless as what Apple offers, it works with a much wider array of devices including some of the best laptops and best PCs.

That isn’t to say there aren’t any downsides to Android. I don’t think anyone would disagree that Android devices tend to suffer a security issue, as it is much easier for malicious hackers to break into the devices. As such, we would always recommend users invest in some of the best Android antivirus apps. Android devices also have an erratic update release schedule, with some devices not getting updates until later than others. That’s in contrast to iPhones, where iOS updates are available to all phones at once.

Apple Intelligence on white background

(Image credit: Apple)

iPhone vs Android: Artificial Intelligence

These days, artificial intelligence is all the rage, with both the iPhone and Android doing their part to add those capabilities to their respective platforms. Apple is behind here, having only launched Apple Intelligence in the fall and rolling out more additions to its suite of AI tools with subsequent iOS updates. In contrast, Android phones have had these features for a while, with Google Pixel devices in particular setting the standard for on-board AI.

How does the iPhone stand out?

While it’s relatively new, Apple Intelligence has made a strong debut, adding writing tools, photo-editing features and a revamped Siri assistant to the iPhone. That said, there’s nothing in Apple Intelligence thus far that hasn’t been offered on Android phones. Also, Apple Intelligence is limited to the recent iPhone 16 models plus the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max.

On the bright side, a lot of Apple Intelligence features run entirely on the iPhone, ensuring both privacy and speedy performance. The features that require the cloud are handled by private, secure servers.

How Does Android Stand Out

Android devices enjoy an advantage on the AI front, given their head start over the iPhone. More devices have access to AI, with each top phone maker offering their own take on AI, whether that’s Galaxy AI on Samsung devices or the suite of AI tools available to Google Pixel users.

But those AI experiences can vary widely from Android phone to Android phone. While Google features are fairly polished, the same can’t be said of devices like the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. And given the irregular update schedule for Android devices, new AI features won’t appear with the regularity you’ll get with an iPhone.

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra held in hand together.

(Image credit: Future)

iPhone vs Android: Chipsets

Because of the wider variety of Android phones, you’ll get a wide variance in the silicon powering those devices. Budget and midrange models run on less robust chips on the Android side, while the lowest-priced iPhone — the iPhone SE — tends to adopt the chipset of the iPhone flagship released the previous fall. The upcoming iPhone SE 4, for example, is likely to run on the same A18 system-on-chip powering the iPhone 16.

So when comparing chipsets, it’s best to restrict ourselves to the high-end devices. The current iPhones use either an A18 or A18 Pro system-on-chip that Apple designs. Most Android flagships tend to use Qualcomm’s Snapdragon silicon, with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 powering current high-end phones. The Snapdragon 8 Elite is the successor to that chip, and it’s likely to appear in many top Android phones in 2025. Like Apple, Google develops its own chips, with the Tensor G4 powering the new Pixel 9 models.

Benchmark testing can illustrate the differences in how these different chips perform. For example, the Geekbench test compares the CPUs of different chipsets, with single and multicore results revealing how the different cores of a CPU perform.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 - Cell 0 Geekbench single-core scoreGeekbench multi-core score
iPhone 16 (A18)3,3018,033
iPhone 16 Pro Max (A18 Pro)3,3868,306
Galaxy S24 Ultra (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)2,3007,294
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)1,3396,543
Pixel 9 Pro (Tensor G4)1,9484,794

For years, Apple had a big performance edge over Android devices, with iPhones typically posting much better Geekbench scores. Recent Qualcomm chips have leveled the playing field, though, particularly when it comes to the multicore results. The new Snapdragon 8 Elite figures to leapfrog Apple’s A18 silicon once more phones start appearing that use the new Qualcomm chip.

On the graphics front, Android phones enjoy a sizable advantage, with recent Snapdragon chips pumping out more frames per second in tests like the 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark. Throw in fast-refreshing displays on most Android flagships, and you’d conclude that Android devices tend to be better for gaming than their iPhone counterparts.

The iPhone continues to enjoy a big lead in our real-world test in which we transcode video using Adobe Premiere Rush. The iPhone 16 Pro Max completes that task in 21 seconds, roughly half the time it takes the Galaxy S24 Ultra.

You’ll notice that Google’s Tensor chip lags behind both the latest Apple A Series silicon and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chipsets. Tensor places its emphasis on powering AI features through its neural engine rather than raw performance.

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra held in hand together.

(Image credit: Future)

iPhone vs Android: Verdict

There’s an argument to be made that variety and differences in smartphones have disappeared over time. Most phones now look pretty much identical, with the days of distinct designs long since passed. As a result, the best platform for your needs reflects what you value in a phone.

People who want a secure device with frequent software updates and a wide array of apps will likely gravitate toward the iPhone, particularly if they have other Apple devices. While Apple’s high prices might be a bit of a turn-off for some, others will appreciate the performance and reliability that Apple’s smartphones provide.

While Android might be lacking in consistent updates, it still has a lot to offer users in terms of variety, current AI features and more. And if you don’t want to pay flagship prices, there are plenty of midrange and budget options that deliver a perfectly fine Android experience.

Josh Render
Staff Writer

Josh is a staff writer for Tom's Guide and is based in the UK. He has worked for several publications but now works primarily on mobile phones. Outside of phones, he has a passion for video games, novels, and Warhammer. 

With contributions from
  • Jean Yus
    admin said:
    Our iPhone vs Android face-off will help you figure out which kind of phone is right for you.

    iPhone vs. Android: Which is better for you? : Read more
    Yeah you should probably live the Google Pixel + Chromebook + Wear OS + Google Home life for a while before doing a comparison like this. Just using an "Android" is not the same experience.. The Google Ecosystem; Assistant integration with Google apps on a Pixel +( a real) Chromebook & G.Home is NOT using a samsung with a clunky a$$ windows machine. Try a while and toss in Google Fi & you'll be throwing rocks at apples. You're welcome.




    (someone fix this ad infested lagfest of a site while you're at it)
    Reply
  • bluesun03
    I have been a top-tier programmer for 47 years, so I'm experienced on dozens of machines, O/S's & languages. The one platform I absolutely refuse to use is Apple's. Why?

    1. Steve Jobs started the policy of charging 100% markup on all Apple products (50% for an iPhone or iMac, 50% for profit). All profit goes to a tax haven in Ireland so Apple pays NO federal corporate taxes in the United States.

    2. In my 47 years working for banks & investment houses on Wall St.; digital video TV (I was part of the team that developed the original DVI digital video for PC's with Intel in the late '80s, early '90s, IPTV in mid 2000s (making fiber obsolete in much of the world), 1K HDTV, 4K & 8K UHDTV & other systems), hospitals like the Mayo Clinic (COVID sequencing), Mass General, & others; numerous AT&T/Bell Labs projects, & other corporate clients, I've seen just about every computer since the IBM/360 - yet the only computer I've NEVER seen used to develop professional commercial production systems is the MacIntosh (except sometimes in the art department). It was designed for people who wanted to use computers, but not have to understand how they worked.

    3. I went to school with Andy Hertzfeld, leader of the original Mac/Lisa desktop design team. He told me horror stories about Jobs and his contempt for just about everybody, including his own most enthusiastic customers, in '91 when our Intel DVI video beat the first Mac Laptop & first Word for Windows for Best In Show. For example, at a design meeting to discuss how many buttons to have on the mouse, there were 2 camps, the 2-button camp & the 3-button camp (like the Sun early computers). At one point, Jobs jumped up & slammed his fist on the table & angrily blurted out, "You don't understand who we are designing this computer for. They are the sort of people who will have trouble telling left from right - we go with 1 button."

    4. Jobs routinely lied about the capabilities of his products. Example, he claimed (truthfully) that the iPhone 4S had a full 1Ghz clock speed like its Android competitors. He also claimed (also truthfully) that the 4S got better battery life - like the older iPhone 4. He lied by omission by not telling customers that, before the phones left the factory, they were underclocked to run at 800 MHz. It's like paying more for an 8-cylinder pickup that claimed it got the same gas mileage as the 6-cylinder model, only to find out the manufacturer disconnected 2 cylinders at the factory.

    5. Google makes all of the Android O/S source public through the AOSP (Android Open Source Project) so programmers can take the code as a guide and write scores of custom Android operating systems, both simpler and far more complicated than the official versions. Apple keeps its code confidential & nobody can make their Apple far more powerful & versatile than a "rooted" Android with a custom version of Android, a custom kernel, & hundreds of custom programs that require administrative (SU or SuperUser) access to the kernel). Apple's can only be jailbroken, letting you run apps you don't get from the Apple Store (and they made that illegal until the courts struck it down).

    6. Rooting: Android phones are actually running on Linux kernels & you can "root" almost any Android phone to get superuser access to the kernel level, including the directory levels that are not accessible on any store-bought phone of any kind. You can run hundreds of powerful apps (go to Google Play & enter "rooted" to see lists of them). You can also delete or disable ANY application installed on the phone, including the spyware & bloatware all companies & SPs put on their phones. You can then recover that storage to fit more of your own apps. You can even bring up a Linux command box and (with all the Linux commands provided by the BusyBox rooted app) have access to command-line Linux, making your phone a Linux computer. You can back up not only your user apps/data, but also your system apps/data & the kernel - say to your PC so you can restore a bricked phone (try Titanium Pro). Another example is RCB (Root Call Blocker). When you block spam or scam numbers, both iPhone and Android blockers do a pickup/hangup process. This still lets the caller know this is a live, in-use line, which is the objective of maybe a third of all spam calls. Then they still put your number on "active number" lists to sell to third-parties as "verified" numbers. On my rooted phone, I use RCB, which is able to intercept the call before it gets to the phone circuitry and return the "out of service" signal of a dead line. This has cut my spam by at least 75%.

    7. If all you want is texting, a camera, email & access to social media (which harvests all of your personal information for advertisers & political interference), ANY phone is fine, including 15-year-old flip-phones which are coming back into demand by Gen Z'ers for their simplicity.

    8. Do you really need 20 megapixel cameras if all you are doing is posting to social media or sending .jpgs to friends? The sheer size of these files is vastly greater than 95% (make that 99%) want to deal with. They just eat up storage, take forever to upload & download to clouds & put a major strain on sms & email (most email clients limit the size of attachments anyway). Anything from 600x400 to 1K HD is perfectly adequate & far more practical.

    8. Jobs decided at the start to sell Macs via the evangelical methodology with Jobs (who couldn't write a single line of code if he had to) as the original evangelist, creating what my associates call the iCult. Long-time chief evangelist, Apple's Guy Kawasaki, was quoted as saying "Don't worry. Be Crappy. Revolutionary means you ship and then test ... Lots of things made the first Mac in 1984 a piece of crap - but it was a revolutionary piece of crap."

    Reply
  • Anirudh Amudhan
    Hello Jordan Palmer,

    I am a big tech enthusiast and I would like to share my views on Apple vs. Android with you.

    As I was reading through your magazine I would agree with you for many of your statements. The iPhone ecosystem is a big feature to consider when choosing software. The Apple ecosystem allows users to fluidly use Apple devices together with not many stated bugs. The ecosystem allows sending files to other Apple devices in full quality which I think is a big plus and removes the hassle of email. Also with the new IOS feature iPhone users can share contacts with a tap, which makes life so much easier. Another feature I admire about IOS is transitions between devices, when I am viewing media on one device I can easily transition to another device with a couple of clicks a most.

    On the other hand, Andriod OS is not something to ignore. Especially with the new Android 14 many Android phones have released AI to their software making many tasks for users much easier. With AI, users can translate calls in many languages, edit photos with ease and less experience, and tie in with the real world by using image search on unknown objects. Though iPhones focus on simplicity, android allows for customization and to show personality. In the Google world, many apps can replace the stock Android apps, and customization options such as personal icons, fonts, live wallpapers, and animations are just better than what Apple has to offer for its users.

    Thanks for reading.
    Reply
  • kiniku
    TLDR: if you are a Windows PC user Android is really your only choice. (Windows Phone Link for the iPhone is a joke.) As I type this my iPhone 15 Pro Max is to my left and a new OnePlus 12 is inbound as its replacement. There is a lot to like about the iPhone: app polish and simplicity. But in my personal experience, its voice dictation is awful. Which I use as a lifeblood. Its notification options are paltry. Its keyboard, even 3rd party, suck compared to Android's options. I call the iPhone trained rats in an easy maze. But if simplicity and a "feeling" of "it always works" is vitally important to you, the iPhone is your phone.
    Reply