Google's Pixel Buds Are (Nearly) Universal Translator

Google has finally made its own headphones, and they do so much more than just play music. On stage at its San Francisco hardware event today (Oct. 4), the company showed off the $159 device, which can translate conversations between people speaking 40 different languages -- but not if you're using an iPhone.

Image: Google

Image: Google

The Pixel Buds come in black, white, and "kinda blue," and come with a charging case that Google says provides 24 hours of battery life.

However, the Pixel Buds don't do the translation all on their own. On Google's product page for Pixel Buds reads:

"Use of Pixel Buds as an audio headset requires a Bluetooth enabled companion device. For minimum OS and hardware requirements, go to g.co/pixelbuds/help. Additionally, the Google Assistant on Google Pixel Buds is only available on Android and requires an Assistant-enabled Android device and data connection. For available Google Assistant languages and minimum requirements, go to g.co/pixelbuds/help."

In short: You need an Android phone, and iPhone users aren't welcome.

Still, the Pixel Buds made for one of the coolest demos on Google's stage, and we hope the Buds work as well in real life. We look forward to getting our hands on them and trying the translation feature out on our own.

TOPICS
Andrew E. Freedman

Andrew E. Freedman is an editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming as well as keeping up with the latest news. He holds a M.S. in Journalism (Digital Media) from Columbia University. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Kotaku, PCMag, Complex, Tom's Guide and Laptop Mag among others.

Latest in Earbuds
EarFun OpenJump open-ear earbuds photographed in front of a blue background.
EarFun OpenJump review: I couldn’t take these earbuds off quick enough
Soundcore AeroClip open-ear earbuds in champagne mist against a blue backdrop
Soundcore AeroClip review: sleek looks and stunning sound, these new open-ears just blew me away
1MORE SonoFlow SE HQ31
I just tested these noise-cancelling headphones — and it's hard to believe they're just $40
Powerbeats Pro 2 vs. AirPods Pro 2
Powerbeats Pro 2 vs. Apple AirPods Pro 2 — which Apple earbuds win?
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs. Beats Fit Pro: Which are the best Beats earbuds?
LG Tone Free T90S earbuds in charging case held up in front of a garden.
LG Tone Free T90S buds have three amazing features every audio company should copy
Latest in News
ChatGPT on iPhone
ChatGPT was down — updates on quick outage
Emma D'Arcy in House of the Dragon season 2
‘House of the Dragon’ season 3 has officially begun filming — what it could mean for the potential release window
AirPods Max in various colors
AirPods Max is getting a big update with lossless audio and ultra-low latency — here's how it works
A mosquito resting on a plant
Experts predict a spring surge in these 9 pest populations — here's what's forecast for your area
Apple Watch SE (2022) shown on wrist
Apple Watch SE 3 reportedly in ’serious jeopardy’ — here’s why
Galaxy S25 Plus held in the hand.
Samsung could delay One UI 7’s release in the US — here’s what we know
  • gaius_iulius
    lol, Google hardly "invented" that ... instant translation software reacting to audio input has been on the market for years, various companies offer it.
    Translation quality is substandard, however ... and that won't change until somebody figures out how to stop the software from translating everything literally, and how to make it understand slang words and slurred speech.
    This will require a major advance in AI, and won't happen for many, many years.

    If Google uses the same engine that is being employed on translate.google.com (and it probably does), translations by the Pixel Buds device will be laughably bad.
    Reply
  • kc8ler
    @gaius_iulius I wonder where the negativity comes from? I for one find the idea exciting that Google will bring a translator to market. Lets see your competitive device. I say let the people that can, do. Let the people that can't, watch; in angry self important silence.
    Reply
  • gaius_iulius
    @kc8ler The negativity comes from experience with Google's translator as well as their search engine, maps etc. You may be a Google fanboy, but not everybody is happy with being spied upon, be it through software or through their hardware devices.

    In addition, the title of the thread is highly misleading: Nothing was newly invented, and 40 languages is hardly universal, not even (nearly) so.
    The article sounds more like a sales pitch than an objective review.

    And "my competitive device"? Pointing out known shortcomings doesn't automatically imply having a solution. If, for example, a graphics card is being reviewed, stating that it is unsuited for a certain game doesn't mean the reviewer has to build one which can handle the game. Silly notion.

    At this time, nobody is capable of producing software which translates reliably, as I have pointed out in my first post ... and nobody will be able to do so for some years to come.

    While your being "excited" about the device is cute, I suggest you wait until you can appraise its capabilities. You'll probably be disappointed.

    As a matter of fact, I wished somebody could come up with a usable translation device accepting audio input ... it would save me a lot of money spent on translators and interpreters (the type that walks on legs and gets paid by the hour).

    As soon as such a device exists, I'll be happy to purchase it, though neither from Google nor from Microsoft but rather from a company which won't use it to spy on me.
    Reply
  • pepitolema
    Well said Gaius-Julius funny name. I am afraid to say that everything presented by the spying on us 'giants' such as google, facebook, twitter and apple will have a hard time realising that more people do not trust them at all, let alone their proucts.
    Reply