Galaxy Note 9 Benchmarked: iPhone X Is Still Faster
The Snapdragon 845-powered Note 9 looks plenty powerful based on our initial benchmarking, but it doesn't beat the iPhone X.
With its Snapdragon 845 processor, we didn't think the $999 Galaxy Note 9 was going to break any speed records, but it is paired with a robust 6GB of RAM. And you can get a Note 9 with 8GB of RAM if you really want top performance — and you're willing to shell out $1,249.
We tested the 6GB model of the Note 9 with 128GB of storage, and we've run a handful of benchmarks so far with more to come. Spoiler alert: the iPhone X is still faster.
Geekbench 4
Row 0 - Cell 0 | Geekbench 4 Multicore Score |
Galaxy Note 9 | 8,876 |
iPhone X | 10,357 |
OnePlus 6 | 9,088 |
Galaxy S9+ | 8,295 |
Pixel 2 XL | 6,282 |
LG G7 ThinQ | 8,566 |
Galaxy Note 8 | 6,564 |
Geekbench 4 measures overall performance, and the Note 9 delivers solid performance in the benchmark's multi-core test. The Note 9 notched 8,876, which is considerably better than last year's Note 8. It also smokes the Pixel 2 XL, but that phone was running an older Snapdragon 835 chip, just like the Note 8.
Among current Android flagships, the OnePlus 6 scored a higher 9.088. However, that phone was packing 8GB of RAM, and you can get the Galaxy Note 8 with the same amount. Too bad you have to pay a whopping $1,249 for the privilege. The 8GB model of the OnePlus costs only $579, though you get 128GB of storage. The 8GB Note 9 comes with a crazy 512GB of storage built in.
The cream of the crop remains the iPhone X, which scored 10,357 with its A11 Bionic processor. And with an A12-powered iPhone X and iPhone X Plus on the horizon, Apple will likely widen its lead.
MORE: Galaxy Note 9 Full Specs and Pricing: Here's What You Get
Sign up to get the BEST of Tom's Guide direct to your inbox.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
3DMark Slingshot Extreme 3.1
Row 0 - Cell 0 | 3D Mark Slingshot Extreme 3.1 Score |
Galaxy Note 9 | 4,639 |
iPhone X | 4,994 |
OnePlus 6 | 5,124 |
Galaxy S9+ | 4,634 |
Pixel 2 XL | 3,679 |
LG G7 ThinQ | 4,201 |
Galaxy Note 8 | 3,710 |
Slingshot Extreme is the most demanding graphics test in 3DMark's mobile arsenal, and the Note 9 fared pretty well, but it's outperformed by both the iPhone X and OnePlus 6.
The Galaxy Note 9 scored 4,639, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S9+ (4,634) and ahead of the LG G7 (4,201). However, the OnePlus 6 with 8GB of RAM smoked the Note 9 with a score of 5,124; the iPhone X (4,994) also fared better.
Display Brightness (nits)
Row 0 - Cell 0 | Brightness (in nits) |
Galaxy Note 9 | 604 |
iPhone X | 574 |
OnePlus 6 | 574 |
Galaxy S9+ | 630 |
Pixel 2 XL | 438 |
LG G7 ThinQ | 900 |
Galaxy Note 8 | 408 |
The Note 9 sports a big and gorgeous 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display with quad HD resolution, and it gets plenty bright. Using our light meter, we registered 604 nits of brightness. That's brighter than the OnePlus and iPhone X, which both hit 574 nits, and miles better than the Pixel 2 XL's lowly 438 nits. But the Galaxy S9+ turned in an even higher score of 630 nits.
The brightest of the bunch is LG's G7 ThinQ, which registered an eye-popping 900 nits.
MORE: Galaxy Note 9 vs. Galaxy Note 8: What's New?
Display Color Gamut
Row 0 - Cell 0 | sRGB Color Gamut (percentage) |
Galaxy Note 9 | 224 percent |
iPhone X | 128.6 percent |
OnePlus 6 | 240.3 percent |
Galaxy S9+ | 231 percent |
Pixel 2 XL | 130 percent |
LG G7 ThinQ | 138.8 percent |
Galaxy Note 8 | 204.8 percent |
This is one colorful display. The Note 9's AMOLED panel registered an impressive 224 percent of the sRGB color gamut, which is miles better than the iPhone X's 128.6 percent. It also leaves LCD phones like the LG G7 (138.8 percent) in the dust.
However, the OnePlus 6 squeaked out a victory here by hitting 240.3 percent.
Bottom Line
We'll be running more tests to see just how well the Note 9 performs in the real world. This will include our video editing test and other tests designed to put the phone's new water cooling to the test. But, for now, the iPhone X remains in the lead in terms of sheer speed. And Apple will likely widen the speed gap with its expected trio of A12-powered new iPhones coming next month.
Credit: Tom's Guide
Mark Spoonauer is the global editor in chief of Tom's Guide and has covered technology for over 20 years. In addition to overseeing the direction of Tom's Guide, Mark specializes in covering all things mobile, having reviewed dozens of smartphones and other gadgets. He has spoken at key industry events and appears regularly on TV to discuss the latest trends, including Cheddar, Fox Business and other outlets. Mark was previously editor in chief of Laptop Mag, and his work has appeared in Wired, Popular Science and Inc. Follow him on Twitter at @mspoonauer.
-
jetcongroup Sorry but your tests are not valid. You are not licenced to run such tests as reputable results, in other words your word means shit. Is your "organization" recognized word wide as a reputable organization to claim these false results? Because you see I own both phones in my household and what you just stated is completely false, znd will therefore assume you are trying to get your nose in apples taint. Find a new job. In all honesty your organization should face litigation for falsifying data results, I will look into it.Reply -
frank-g So???? and who cares? Are we that anal, that couple micro seconds are now the deciding factor on which phone is better than the other? Same goes for that constant whine about the finger print sensor not being on the screen. Big deal!! The Note 9 will do all I need for my job and personal use. How about writing how the Note 9 beats the iPhone, since it has stylus, and the iPhone doesn't? Again who cares? It is all part of personal preference, and for my part I can't wait to receive my Note 9. Oh yes, and about the price....If you can't afford it, don't buy it!Reply -
crfralick Wow Jetcongroup, have an anger management problem much? Why do you care anyway? My son has the previous Galaxy and my wife now has an iPhone X. The iPhone is MUCH better in most ways. Why is that such an issue for you?Reply -
df251122 I don't like Apple i Pads that much, this looks like a good mobile / notebook even if it's a bit pricey , i would prefer something much bigger especially if it was that much cheaper.Reply -
samuel.0986 My gs9+ scores: geekbenchReply
single core:2441
Multicore: 9005
In 3D mark for some reson the scores are different now, i dont know if is 3Dmark or the updates but my first score for slingshot extreme unlimited was 5900+ for some reson now is 5036.
Other benchmar are the same, antutu is 26300+ and gfxbench car chase is 58 fps.
And the score for the iphone x sling shot extreme unlimited is 3168 https://benchmarks.ul.com/hardware/phone/Apple+iPho
The iphone could be more faster on the cpu side but not the gpu side. -
akmalfitri54 In term of customization, iphone k.o. Own an iPhone is like own a same design car with different engine cc for years. Your car looks the same every yearReply