Tom's Guide Verdict

Get the Kodak Smile if you’re looking for a pocketable instant camera for less than $100.

Pros

+
Easy to use
+
Clever design
+
Good price

Cons

-
Slow startup
-
So-so print quality

Why you can trust Tom's Guide Our writers and editors spend hours analyzing and reviewing products, services, and apps to help find what's best for you. Find out more about how we test, analyze, and rate.

The new generation of instant cameras that has cropped up in recent years lets you enjoy the nostalgia of printed photos while adding some of the niceties of the digital age. Although some of these instant devices are a little too clever, the $99 Kodak Smile does a good job of balancing both the old and new.

Clever, Simple Design

Kodak’s Smile camera has a fun sliding mechanism that opens to turn on the camera and reveal its lens and controls. This feature also helps to ensure that the device doesn't turn on accidentally in your pocket. My only quibble is that it takes about 9 seconds for the camera to be ready to shoot.

A small color LCD display on the back shows you a live preview, battery life, the status of the flash, and if there’s any paper inside. This camera is a lot more responsive than the older Kodak MiniShot.

Photo Quality

Considering that the Smile is ostensibly a Kodak product, it’s a little ironic that it doesn’t use actual photo paper like Fujifilm’s Instax cameras, but instead uses Zink technology, making this camera more like a mini-printer.

I’ve been less than impressed with previous generations of Zink cameras, as the prints were less vibrant and the colors less accurate, than those taken with instant cameras that used actual photo paper.

MORE: Best Cameras

Evidently, the technology has improved; I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the photos taken with the Smile. A shot of a baby in a pink jumper sitting on a blue bedsheet was nice and vibrant, as was a photo of a red flower with a green park bench in the background. On the latter, though, there was a loss of detail in the petals.

Still, the prints from the Kodak Smile weren’t as good as those from other Zink cameras. When I took similar shots of a white cat lying on a pink carpet with the Canon Ivy Cliq, the Smile tended to make the cat look more pink than white. The colors in the Cliq’s photos were more accurate.

I also liked that the Smile doesn’t automatically print out every photo you take; given the cost of paper — a pack of 50 sheets costs $24 — I’m loathe to waste a sheet on a lousy photo. I also liked that I could apply filters (monochrome, Vintage, Aqua) or add a border after taking a shot.

MORE: Kodak Photo Printer Mini Review: A Mobile Photo Standout

Photos take 35 seconds to print, and unlike previous Kodak cameras that moved the sheet in and out of the camera multiple times, the Smile’s pops out just once.

Other Features

Despite its claims of taking 5-megapixel photos, the digital images the camera records are just 854 x 640 pixels. The Smile has 4 megabytes of internal storage, which is good for 2 to 3 photos; you’ll want to get a microSD card.

In addition to adding filters, which are pretty limited, you can also shoot in Photo Booth mode, which will put two photos on a single piece of paper. I also liked that the Smile’s flash can be set to On, Off, or Auto; the older Kodak Printomatic had a flash that fired whether you want it to or not.

You can take about 40 shots before the Smile needs to be recharged via its micro-USB port.

MORE: Best Photo Printers 2019

What you don’t get with the Smile are some advanced features found on more expensive instant cameras like the Polaroid Snap Touch, such as the ability to shoot videos, or print photos from your smartphone, like you can with the Ivy Cliq+. But those cameras cost about $60 more.

Bottom Line

It’s tempting for camera companies to try and cram all sorts of new features into their products. But the defining proposition of instant cameras, aside from their price, is their simplicity and ease of use. The $99 Kodak Smile gets this right. While it has an LCD and the ability to store and reprint photos, the technology doesn’t get in the way of the experience of taking a picture and having a print mere seconds later. Ultimately, isn’t that what you want out of an instant camera?

Michael A. Prospero is the U.S. Editor-in-Chief for Tom’s Guide. He oversees all evergreen content and oversees the Homes, Smart Home, and Fitness/Wearables categories for the site. In his spare time, he also tests out the latest drones, electric scooters, and smart home gadgets, such as video doorbells. Before his tenure at Tom's Guide, he was the Reviews Editor for Laptop Magazine, a reporter at Fast Company, the Times of Trenton, and, many eons back, an intern at George magazine. He received his undergraduate degree from Boston College, where he worked on the campus newspaper The Heights, and then attended the Columbia University school of Journalism. When he’s not testing out the latest running watch, electric scooter, or skiing or training for a marathon, he’s probably using the latest sous vide machine, smoker, or pizza oven, to the delight — or chagrin — of his family.