I took over 200 photos with the iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra — here's the winner

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra held in hand together.
(Image credit: Future)

I’m putting the two best camera phones around in a head-to-head showdown to see which is better for photography. In my iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S24 Ultra, I've taken over 200 photos in varying situations to compare their main cameras, telephoto zooming, macrophotography, low-light performance and more.

200 Photos Between iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra | Here’s the Winner - YouTube 200 Photos Between iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra | Here’s the Winner - YouTube
Watch On

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: The Cameras

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra held in hand together.

(Image credit: Future)

Before I get into the good stuff, I want to quickly talk about the cameras. In our iPhone 16 Pro Max review, it uses a similar triple camera setup as before, but this year’s change is found in the ultrawide. It’s now a 48MP one with a wider f/2.2 aperture, which means it has better light gathering than the iPhone 15 Pro Max. Paired with its 48MP main shooter and 12MP telephoto with 2x zoom, it’s still a power packed camera system.

Meanwhile, I said in my Galaxy S24 Ultra review that it set the bar early in the year in what I want in a camera phone — and that’s despite the controversy around its zoom camera, which goes from a 10x optical zoom to a 5x one instead. Still, I’ve seen that it still pulls out incredible results, but it’s going to need a lot more to beat the newer iPhone 16 Pro Max. You have a 200MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide, 10MP telephoto with 3x zoom, and a 50MP telephoto with 5x zoom.

After Apple’s Glowtime event in Cupertino, I traveled with the two flagship phones to Half Moon Bay to capture the same set of photos with both. Afterwards, I looked through all the comparison photos on a monitor to better tell their differences. I’m excited for this one because it could effectively show me which is the best camera phone for the rest of the year, especially know how my 200 photo shoot out with the iPhone 15 Pro Max vs. Galaxy S24 Ultra turned out earlier this year.

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: daytime

I was on the beach for these shots and it’s a perfect spot to see how their main cameras compare. Look quickly and you might think they’re the same, but they’re not.

If you zoom into the red Adirondack chair, there’s more detail with the iPhone, especially with the textures around the chair and the screws around it. And while the Galaxy S24 Ultra delivers an excellent shot, it’s too aggressive with the color saturation — which gives the iPhone the more true-to-life look.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max 

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: dynamic range

Next up, I stopped by this brewery in Half Moon Bay with the Tom’s Guide team to grab a drink and the bar was the perfect place to see how they handle dynamic range. That’s because the inside was pretty dark, but the windows on the outside let in strong light.

My eyes instantly gravitate towards the strong contrast look with the Galaxy S24 Ultra, but when I compare it to the iPhone 16 Pro Max, it blows out the highlights. As a result, the outside area loses detail — while the iPhone does a better job of neutralizing the exposure throughout the shot.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: colors

This next one’s tough because it’s so close between them. In most of the photos I captured, the Galaxy S24 Ultra tends to cast the more saturated color. But with this mosaic I shot in downtown Half Moon Bay, it’s a nearly even matchup.

I really like the colors here, they’re bright and punchy to the eye — so for me, it comes down to the exposure. The iPhone 16 Pro Max does a better job because the Galaxy S24 Ultra is a smidge bright, which results in the colors becoming too washed out.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: macro

Apple wasn’t kidding around when it said that the iPhone 16 Pro Max is much improved with macro photography. Not only was I able to get much closer to this flower while keeping most of it in focus, it also captures more detail. If you look in the middle, you can even make a hidden spider there.

The Galaxy S24 Ultra also captures an incredible shot, but the over-sharpening effect makes it look too processed when I zoom into it.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: zoom

Again these two camera phones are evenly matched in the zoom department because they carry telephoto cameras with 5x optical zoom lenses. For these shots, I really have to pixel peep because they’re similar when I look at the overall picture. They’re evenly exposed for the most part, but the iPhone 16 Pro Max does better in the shadows, which you can see in the tree in the lower left.

However, the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s shot has a slightly sharper look. It’s hard to see unless you zoom in, like the letters underneath the giant eye in the middle — as well as the same tree in the lower left corner.

Winner: Galaxy S24 Ultra

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: selfie

If coverage is important, you’ll get more of it with the iPhone 16 Pro Max’s 12MP front-facing camera. At arm’s length, it offers a wider field of view compared to the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s 12MP one. But when it comes to image quality, I prefer the Samsung because of the better details.

If you zoom into my face, the Galaxy does a better job of gathering more detail and definition with my facial features — like my eyebrows and scruff around my chin. But I will say that the iPhone has a more even exposure.

Winner: Galaxy S24 Ultra

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: portrait

I shot these portrait photos of my colleague Kate who’s showing off the new Apple Watch Series 10 on her wrist. The first thing that stands out to me are the saturated colors of the Galaxy S24 Ultra. You could say it gives the photo that extra pop, but the iPhone’s more true to life.

On top of that, the iPhone 16 Pro Max’s main camera again pulls in crisper details in these shots at 1x zoom. Take a look at the band on her Apple Watch, it has more definition on it, while the Galaxy S24 Ultra looks more smudgy. Both do a great job at isolating her from the background, but I like the softer look of the background with the iPhone.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: ultrawide

Apple’s refreshed ultrawide camera mainly gets my attention in these shots because of its brighter looks and better dynamic range performance. The colors are also more realistic, especially when the Galaxy adds a lot more saturation to the greens in the shot.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: panorama

The panoramas they capture have massive file sizes, but rightfully so because they contain a lot of detail. Overlooking Half Moon Bay itself, there’s plenty of details captured in both — like the boat in the water and the pink flowers on the right. The only reason I’m giving it to the iPhone 16 Pro Max is because of its even exposure.

The right half off the image retains the same exposure as the left, while the Samsung comes out a tad under exposed. And if you zoom into the shadowed part of the bush in the middle, the iPhone’s better dynamic range performance draws out more details.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: low light

At the same brewery from earlier, I took these shots of my beer in a darker part at the bar. I like how the iPhone 16 Pro Max pulls off the brighter image and how it handles the strong light source that’s reflecting off the back. The Galaxy S24 Ultra looks dark and has this color fringing in the area in the back where the light reflects off from.

I also want to share these other low light shots that my colleague, Mark Spoonauer, took at a park in the late evening. The iPhone again easily pulls off the brighter shot, which I can see with the grass in the foreground — but the sign on the left looks much sharper.

Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra: Verdict

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra held in hand together.

(Image credit: Future)

The iPhone 16 Pro Max benefits from a much improved performance that lets it cruise to the finish line here. The areas where I see the biggest improvement is how it performs better with its dynamic range, which brightens up shadows to draw out details that are otherwise hidden. I also know that the iPhone 16 Pro Max's upgraded ultrawide camera gets a boost to deliver sharper details.

As for the Galaxy S24 Ultra? It’s still an excellent camera phone that only loses out by a sliver in each of the categories — but then again, it’s been out since the beginning of the year. Of course, I’m eager to see how Samsung responds with the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

More from Tom's Guide

Category
Arrow
Arrow
Back to Mobile Cell Phones
Brand
Arrow
RAM
Arrow
Storage Size
Arrow
Colour
Arrow
Condition
Arrow
Price
Arrow
Any Price
Showing 10 of 143 deals
Filters
Arrow
(256GB)
Our Review
1
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 256GB...
Verizon
(256GB 12GB RAM)
Our Review
2
SAMSUNG Galaxy S24 Ultra Dual...
Amazon
Our Review
4
OnePlus - 12 256GB (Unlocked)...
Best Buy
(128GB)
Our Review
5
Pixel 8 Pro Porcelain 128GB...
Google Store NA
(256GB Black)
Our Review
6
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra...
Mint Mobile
(256GB Black)
Our Review
7
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 256...
Visible
Our Review
8
Google Pixel 8 Pro - 128 GB
AT&T Mobility
(256GB White)
Our Review
9
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 256...
Total Wireless
(256GB Black)
Our Review
10
iPhone 16 Pro Max 256GB...
Straight Talk
Load more deals
John Velasco
Senior Channel Editor for Phones

John’s a senior editor covering phones for Tom’s Guide. He’s no stranger in this area having covered mobile phones and gadgets since 2008 when he started his career. On top of his editor duties, he’s a seasoned videographer being in front and behind the camera producing YouTube videos. Previously, he held editor roles with PhoneArena, Android Authority, Digital Trends, and SPY. Outside of tech, he enjoys producing mini documentaries and fun social clips for small businesses, enjoying the beach life at the Jersey Shore, and recently becoming a first time homeowner.

  • sycoreaper
    Typical Apple shill article.

    The photos are preference. One isn't in any category inherently better (exceptions).

    TG genuinely has the crappiest articles which is probably why the sister site TH has infinitely more engagement and less biased "articles".
    Reply
  • nzuzobrian007
    sycoreaper said:
    Typical Apple shill article.

    The photos are preference. One isn't in any category inherently better (exceptions).

    TG genuinely has the crappiest articles which is probably why the sister site TH has infinitely more engagement and less biased "articles".
    Totally agreed these apple sheep are irritating, Samsung killed it especially the dynamic category everything is well lit the foreground is exposed nicely but he goes for apple, just because the background windows is well expored, which one is more important subject of the picture or the way background is??? Bull crap. S24U took it for me by miles and i wasn't watching this alone we both agreed and hid the names of the devices.
    Reply
  • nzuzobrian007
    these apple sheep are irritating, Samsung killed it especially the dynamic category everything is well lit the foreground is exposed nicely but he goes for apple, just because the background windows is well expored, which one is more important subject of the picture or the way background is??? Bull crap. S24U took it for me by miles and i wasn't watching this alone we both agreed and hid the names of the devices.
    Reply
  • typicalpixel
    This article is clearly biased and came down to the "critique's" personal, subjective judgement. Maybe color should be out of the equation when critiquing photos as this will always come down to personal preference. Dynamic range, detail quantity should weigh the critique's objective judgement rather than color and artificial sharpness.
    Reply
  • Ken_G
    I liked the 1st photo of the chairs from the iPhone over Samsungs oversharping. However, the 2nd photo in the bar clearly goes to Samsung. The iPhone has grossly underexposed the subject while Samsung nailed it. The eye is drawn right to the beer levers and what they say, which is what makes a good photo. I stopped there since I question your ability to understand photography.
    Reply
  • jayche
    What a rubbish article that the writer can blatantly lie in face of facts.
    1. Most (if not all) of the photos that the writer complain about over saturation, I see, checked and measured that the S24 Ultra images are in fact less saturated than the iPhone images.
    2. When S24U over sharpens is bad. When the oversharpens, it gives better details. With this sort of logic... wait what logic?

    Conclusion: this place is one of those sites bonded by Apple to give good comments else they don't get to review anymore Apple products. Else, they got a kid who doesn't know "technical terms" to write a "technical" article.
    Reply
  • Jtw222
    While this is a good article it feels like it is not getting the full picture. I would prefer to see an article having full coverage of the devices cameras including 8K and 4K video performance in depth. That means checking image stabilisation in day and night mode. Checking focus while tracking fast objects such as drones. Testing ultra slow motion recording while capturing events such as water movement. Finally for pictures have you used the maximum available resolution?
    Reply
  • Tyler Jordan
    🧐There is no way the 16PM beat the S24U in that first bar photo. The pic from the 16PM was way too dark despite having all that light in the background.
    Reply
  • Photography Lifer
    The assessment of over saturation in bright sunlight is completely off base! it is the exposure, white balance inconstancy! While the Samsung appears in the other photos appears to be slightly under expose in the photo in bright sunlight picture with Adirondack chairs it is heavily over exposed or the white balance is not set properly for daylight

    Since they are writing Algorithm to adjust setting it is judgmentally set by the creator of the calculation to their perspective in appearance under certain conditions and not the performance of the camera. Since these values in digital photography are selected by the photographer in the camera assigned by degrees of kelvin temperature and the placement of light on the sensor, it is always the artistic perspective of the Photographer to present the best possible image as they see it!

    In computational photography, it is the interpretation by the writer of the code for a given condition which does not artistically recognize the nuances of light, intensity color difference impacted by angle, direction and source of light either incidental reflectional, etal. Since photography is an art and computation in cell phones is based on averages, you will never see through the eye of the shooter.

    Beauty is held in the eye of the beholder, and in my photographic journey I have found, what people define and like are as varied as the stars in the heavens. Do not rely on a review, select the one that appeals to your sense of beauty.
    Reply
  • lilak84
    You can see in the Apple selfie that it made you look as good as possible all your flaws the s24 one look more real showed every imperfection on your face and you can zoom in more on it so I guess for women they would like something that makes them look better but it's not really them but that's 24 Ultra which I have in my hand every picture looks true to life damn near I know there's a i in it but I don't have to complain especially not a 200 megapixel
    Reply