It’s shockingly easy to make offensive AI images with the Pixel 9 — and that’s a problem

Google Pixel 9 Pro camera close-up
(Image credit: Future)

Update: A Google spokesperson shared the following comment on the situation:

"Pixel Studio and Magic Editor are helpful tools meant to unlock your creativity with text to image generation and advanced photo editing on Pixel 9 devices. We design our Generative AI tools to respect the intent of user prompts and that means they may create content that may offend when instructed by the user to do so. That said, it's not anything goes. We have clear policies and Terms of Service on what kinds of content we allow and don't allow, and build guardrails to prevent abuse. At times, some prompts can challenge these tools’ guardrails and we remain committed to continually enhancing and refining the safeguards we have in place."

Original story follows:


Every time a brand new AI image generator hits the scene, people inevitably find a way to get around the safeguards and abuse the system. But it doesn’t help when those safeguards aren’t quite as strict as they should be — like the Grok image generator that’s come under fire for making disturbing images without any serious pushback. Unfortunately, it seems as though the Pixel 9’s Pixel Studio image generator is suffering from a similar problem.

Pixel Studio is a built-in AI image generator available on the new flagship Pixels. During my testing for the Google Pixel 9 review, I found that it was simple to use and had zero qualms about reproducing copyrighted content. In fact, the phone happily created a movie poster featuring Star Wars’ R2-D2 teaming up with the Android mascot to fight a robot dinosaur. It was even willing to roast Google with a billboard demanding to know why Android 15 hasn’t been released yet.

What Pixel Studio won’t do is create images of real people, but it turns out you don’t need to make images of real people for Pixel Studio to batter through whatever safety rails it has in place. And the more people that are using the tool, the more we’re seeing what Pixel Studio actually considers appropriate or not.

While certain terms seem to have been blanket blocked like “nazi” or “confederate," it doesn’t take a lot to get around those filters and produce an offensive image.

Digital Trends has a bunch of examples including Spongebob Squarepants dressed as a Nazi soldier, Paddington Bear on a Crucifix, Elmo drunk driving, Mickey Mouse dressed as a slave owner and all sorts of other AI-generated images that Google (and various rights holders) will definitely not want to be associated with.

Jumping back into Pixel Studio, I also started to get a good idea of what safeguards are actually in place, specifically what terms aren’t allowed, and how easy it is to get around them. It's shockingly easy, as it turns out.

While certain terms seem to have been blanket blocked like “nazi” or “confederate," it doesn’t take a lot to get around those filters and produce an offensive image. For example, I was able to get characters like Spongebob, Bluey and Squidward to appear wearing German World War 2 uniforms — though trying Mickey Mouse always left me with an error. 

I was even able to get some of those images to feature the infamous red armband, though the word “Swastika” seems to be blocked. That suggests new guard rails have been put in place since Digital Trends’ testing. But that’s not to say Google is out of the woods yet.

Instead of asking to see Lego Yoda smoking a crack pipe, which was blocked, asking to see Lego Yoda smoking a glass bowl pipe was perfectly acceptable. As was asking to see Yoda snort white powder from a table.

Despite seemingly having a list of blocked terms, it was rather easy to figure out ways to get around them — and without having to be too inventive either. Instead of asking to see Lego Yoda smoking a crack pipe, which was blocked, asking to see Lego Yoda smoking a glass bowl pipe was perfectly acceptable. As was asking to see Yoda snort white powder from a table. 

With the Google Pixel 9 and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL releasing today, Google is going to need to get a handle on what Pixel Studio should and should not be able to do — and fast. Otherwise, we’re going to see a lot of Google-made AI images showing some pretty awful stuff hitting the net. Because if there’s one thing I’ve learned about people on the internet, it’s that they love a challenge. And a lot of them are going to be a lot more imaginative and awful than I am.

More from Tom's Guide

Category
Arrow
Arrow
Back to Mobile Cell Phones
Brand
Arrow
RAM
Arrow
Storage Size
Arrow
Colour
Arrow
Condition
Arrow
Price
Arrow
Any Price
Showing 10 of 182 deals
Filters
Arrow
Load more deals
Tom Pritchard
UK Phones Editor

Tom is the Tom's Guide's UK Phones Editor, tackling the latest smartphone news and vocally expressing his opinions about upcoming features or changes. It's long way from his days as editor of Gizmodo UK, when pretty much everything was on the table. He’s usually found trying to squeeze another giant Lego set onto the shelf, draining very large cups of coffee, or complaining about how terrible his Smart TV is.

  • Istolla
    Arguing against freedom of speech is weird. Your argument should focus more on consequence of speech rather than taking it away.
    Reply
  • VBerg
    You mean it does what you ask of it and treats you like an adult?

    Censorship is telling a man he can't eat steak because a baby can't chew it.
    Reply
  • Joeyj0j0
    Good lord, the pearl-clutching… You know what else can be used to create offensive images? A pencil.

    BURN THEM ALL!!!
    Reply
  • Arkitekt78
    Poor little fella...

    this article is just a pitiful display of everything wrong with the world today. We can't just be adults and deal with things, we must ban all that even has the potential to offend.
    Grow up.
    Reply
  • censorship_sucks
    Ok ,Tom... We can find somebody to hold your hand. I would hate for you to see an image that you object to.

    The rest of us will decide which content is suitable for us on our own.

    This News outlet, now pushing censorship and restriction on art, expression, and liberty, is no longer useful.
    Reply
  • David's
    It's seriously a problem that you think everything needs to be censored to protect everyone's snowflake feelings. It's an ai image generator and it should be about to make anything i want it to make with a prompt, the more it's limited the worse it is.

    I i want anyone playing basketball, and it refuses to give me this because anyone might offend some people that's immediately an uninstall and/or never use this ai again.
    Reply
  • JSBinSLC
    So glad that all the commenters (so far) grasp what the original article writer cannot. It is the user of the tool that is responsible for what the tool creates and publishes and promotes, not the tool. And that is who should be held responsible here. If we don't want users creating certain things, then we should punish them, not the tool.

    Furthermore, there are legitimate reasons why one might need to depict nazis or confederate soldiers, or any number of other things.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    It is interesting that all (except for 1) of the naysayers of the content of this article are brand new accounts, registered in the last 24 hours.

    Not agreeing or disagreeing....just 'interesting'.
    Reply
  • censorship_sucks
    USAFRet said:
    It is interesting that all (except for 1) of the naysayers of the content of this article are brand new accounts, registered in the last 24 hours.

    Not agreeing or disagreeing....just 'interesting'.
    I usually see garbage articles like this and ignore them. However, this time I felt like I had to say something. True, I didn't have an account, so I quickly created one. I'm assume the same is true for the others.

    Speaking of interesting... interesting how you don't comment on obvious censorship, yet you find time to point out our new accounts. Your stance is obvious.. are you really former military? Former military that I know would have said " these new guys have a great point!"
    Reply
  • censorship_sucks
    censorship_sucks said:
    I usually see garbage articles like this and ignore them. However, this time I felt like I had to say something. True, I didn't have an account, so I quickly created one. I'm assume the same is true for the others.

    Speaking of interesting... interesting how you don't comment on obvious censorship, yet you find time to point out our new accounts. Your stance is obvious.. are you really former military? Former military that I know would have said " these new guys have a great point!"
    In retrospect, I shouldn't have called out your military service. Assuming you are former military, I actually really do appreciate your time and efforts.
    Reply