I test headphones for a living and these are the most underrated earbuds
No wireless earbuds have impressed me more than Sennheiser's CX Plus — here’s why
I’ve been a tech writer for 10 years, and have been writing reviews and testing the best wireless earbuds money can buy for Tom’s Guide for about half that time. Currently, my favorite wireless earbuds are the Sony WF-1000XM4, with the AirPods Pro 2 coming in a close second. Entry-level gems like the $49 Donner DoBuds One are also part of my go-to wireless earbud benchmark when comparing rival budget buys, as they offer great sound at a bargain price.
However, there are another set of earbuds that have regained my attention recently — a mid-priced model that I praised heavily upon release and have found even more rewarding nearly a year later. Enter the Sennheiser CX Plus earbuds, which have an MSRP of $179, but are currently just $99 at Amazon.
Sennheiser CX Plus Wireless Earbuds: was $179 now $99 @ Amazon
At their $179 MSRP, the Sennheiser CX Plus face stiff competition, but they're a bargain worth tracking down discounted to $99 at Amazon right now, and one of the top models at the price. Articulate, high-quality sound combined with normal playtimes, effective ANC, and dependable connectivity make them an enticing package.
I’ll admit that my reconnection with these buds happened by accident. Rummaging through the warehouse I call my closet for a pair of 'buds to use while my AirPods recharged, I grabbed a white and blue box and figured that I had Sennheiser’s elite Momentum True Wireless 3 in my hands. As it turned out, I had picked up the CX Plus, as the only accessible pair with enough battery life to get me through a business call.
Talk about fate, because I’ve sworn by the CX Plus for several weeks now. The sound coming out of these buds is amazing, especially when compared to some high-end rivals, including those in Sennheiser's Momentum True Wireless series. Not to mention they boast solid features and some of the best call quality I’ve experienced.
Allow me to break down why Sennheiser’s CX Plus are the most underrated buds out there.
Sennheiser CX Plus: Signature sound and quality ANC for less
Sonically, the CX Plus have Sennheiser's flagship sound profile in a mid-range pair of earbuds. I was blown away by their sound quality in my review, but this revisit has only strengthened my argument for calling them the best-sounding mid-priced wireless earbuds.
Sennheiser’s 7mm drivers are masterfully engineered to produce audio worthy of the brand name. Right out of the box, you get a well-balanced mix of emotive lows, rich mids, and crisp highs. Very few buds at this price range offer this. In fact, I can name a few luxury models that struggle to produce sound as detailed as the CX Plus.
I loved the reproduction on orchestral tracks. Light cymbal taps sounded prominent, and strings were vibrantly smooth, which made jazz performances more intimate. Normally, I would use the AirPods Pro 2 with spatial audio on for immersive listens. The CX Plus sufficed in between charges, but I still prefer the precise instrument placement delivered by Apple’s dynamic head tracking technology.
Furthermore, the CX Plus has an engaging low end that doesn’t diminish the mid or high frequencies. The thumping resonance from drums was satisfying. Monophonic, distorted effects also came thorough clearly on electronics tracks.
Special features like a three-band EQ and pre-programmed presets allow for personalized sound. However, Sennheiser’s default sound signature is perfect as is, and I recommend leaving it alone to get the best results. The Neutral EQ and onboard DSP (digital signal processing) stabilize sound and volume for exceptional output.
The Sennheiser CX Plus earbuds have support for aptX Adaptive codec, which has a significant audio quality boost to Bluetooth streaming when connected to compatible devices.
Latency was nonexistent from my playback device on video platforms such as Netflix and YouTube, with audio perfectly in sync.
Active noise cancellation is one of the CX Plus’ biggest selling points. The technology performs well. I can gladly say my listening sessions were disruption free. High frequencies were handled surprisingly better than Sennheiser’s Momentum True Wireless 2, and the sound is uncompromised when listening to music with ANC on.
Sennheiser CX Plus: A great calling headset
I considered the CX Plus to be one of the best headphones for voice and video calls in my original review. Nothing has changed. Indoor calls sounded stellar with Sennheiser’s mics eliminating ambient noises at a high level and snatching every spoken syllable. Most clients barely heard household distractions (e.g., electronic toys, loud TVs) during chats.
In my original review, I received feedback about my voice sounding harsh during outdoor calls. That was only the case when teetering around the max Bluetooth range (60 feet), at least that’s what I discovered when I tried them out this time around.
Standing within around 40 feet provided a stronger connection for clear-sounding speech on calls. The mics also blocked out a significant amount of noise when chatting outside.
Sennheiser CX Plus: Top performance and value
Even at the full $180 MSRP, the Sennheiser CX Plus 'buds are great value, and even more so when they can be picked up discounted to $99 at Amazon. Although Sennheiser's Momentum True Wireless 3 flagship buds are more feature-heavy, they aren’t reasonably attainable at $249.
Getting flagship sound and some headlining features for around half the price (or less) make the CX Plus extremely enticing. Revisiting them almost a year on from my original review has been a useful reminder that you don't necessarily have to go for top tier models to get flagship performance.
The Sennheiser CX Plus rank top for value for money in our best wireless earbuds buying guide, and are even more spectacular with one of the current discounts on offer. Snap 'em up while you can.
Sign up to get the BEST of Tom's Guide direct to your inbox.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
A lifestyle journalist with an affinity for consumer products, Alex has over a decade of experience and has worked with popular publications such as Complex, Thrillist, Men’s Health, Gear Patrol, AskMen, and Hoop Magazine. He currently focuses on audio, reviewing the most coveted headphones in the market for both Tom’s Guide and Laptop Magazine.
- Lee DunkleyAudio Editor
-
guycuthbert I'm confused... At the start of the article (paragraph 3) you say that the CX Plus doesn't have ANC but then towards the end of the interview you state that the ANC is very effective. Which is correct?Reply -
ShinyAds I'm also confused...Reply
'AptX Adaptive codec support gives Bluetooth streaming quality a significant boost, especially on Android devices. Bitrate speeds were faster when playing Tidal tracks over Wi-Fi on my Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G' - I thought that phone (and most recent Samsung phones) only supports basic AptX and not Adaptive? -
ShinyAds
Has the article been corrected now (I can't see where it says it doesn't have ANC)?guycuthbert said:I'm confused... At the start of the article (paragraph 3) you say that the CX Plus doesn't have ANC but then towards the end of the interview you state that the ANC is very effective. Which is correct? -
sonicmustard
You're quite right, the Samsung phone doesn't support aptX Adaptive. Apologies for the confusion. This has now been edited to make it clear.ShinyAds said:Has the article been corrected now (I can't see where it says it doesn't have ANC)?
Additionally, the CX Plus earbuds do have ANC. The Amazon deal block added to the opinion article has now been corrected. Again, apologies for the confusion. -
sonicmustard
The CX Plus earbuds do have ANC. An incorrect deal block was added to the opinion article but has now been corrected. Apologies for the confusion.guycuthbert said:I'm confused... At the start of the article (paragraph 3) you say that the CX Plus doesn't have ANC but then towards the end of the interview you state that the ANC is very effective. Which is correct? -
ShinyAds
Sorry but I'm still confused! I don't understand the relevance of streaming on Tidal - I know Tidal usually encodes at a higher bitrate than, say, YT Music, but the higher bitrate would be the same for any earbud.sonicmustard said:You're quite right, the Samsung phone doesn't support aptX Adaptive. Apologies for the confusion. This has now been edited to make it clear.
In other words, if the CX Plus are using Bluetooth and connecting via vanilla aptX, won't the bitrate be the same as any other buds connected using Bluetooth via vanilla aptX (and worse than those connected using LDAC)? -
sonicmustard You are 100% correct. The reference the writer made to Tidal has now been removed from the article.Reply
As an aside, there are some audio benefits to be had by starting out with a higher bitrate from a lossless streaming service such as Apple or Tidal. Try streaming Hans Zimmer's "Time" on both Spotify and then the lossless version from Apple Music (or Tidal), and hear the difference. I am perhaps going off topic here, but you should be able to hear the sound quality step up with the lossless version, even over the bitrate-strangling Bluetooth wireless connectivity between the playback device and earbuds. -
ShinyAds
Thanks for the edit.sonicmustard said:You are 100% correct. The reference the writer made to Tidal has now been removed from the article.
As an aside, there are some audio benefits to be had by starting out with a higher bitrate from a lossless streaming service such as Apple or Tidal. Try streaming Hans Zimmer's "Time" on both Spotify and then the lossless version from Apple Music (or Tidal), and hear the difference. I am perhaps going off topic here, but you should be able to hear the sound quality step up with the lossless version, even over the bitrate-strangling Bluetooth wireless connectivity between the playback device and earbuds.
You were not going off topic, as I had already made the point in my previous reply that Tidal encode in a higher bitrate that some of their competitors. Maybe that information will be of use to someone who was unaware of this. -
sonicmustard
This article may go some way to explaining things further: https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/spotify-is-great-but-tidal-sounds-betterShinyAds said:Thanks for the edit.
You were not going off topic, as I had already made the point in my previous reply that Tidal encode in a higher bitrate that some of their competitors. Maybe that information will be of use to someone who was unaware of this. -
ShinyAds
Again, not useful for me but maybe for others.sonicmustard said:This article may go some way to explaining things further: https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/spotify-is-great-but-tidal-sounds-better