Google’s Gemini AI has been making waves, leaving many users wondering if the upgrade to Gemini Advanced is really worth it. Now that Gemini 2.0 is free to everyone, those without a subscription get access to the powerful 2.0 Flash models.
Those with a Gemini Advanced subscription pay $20 per month and have access to Google’s most capable models including the new experimental model 2.0 Pro which can understand and analyze uploads up to 1,500 pages, lengthy reports, and entire manuscripts. Users can create and use AI experts for any topic with Gems and have access to Gemini Deep Research.
While both payment tiers offer powerful AI capabilities, Gemini Advanced is designed to handle more complex reasoning, deeper research, and nuanced problem-solving—but does it truly deliver?
To find out, I decided to put both versions to the test with seven carefully designed prompts, spanning everything from creative writing and technical troubleshooting to real-time research and coding. The goal? To compare their accuracy, depth, creativity, and overall usefulness in everyday tasks.
1. Complex reasoning
Prompt: "Explain the concept of quantum computing in simple terms, then provide a more technical explanation for someone with a computer science background."
Gemini 2.0 Flash provided a clear and concise explanation suitable for both general audiences and those with a technical background.
It effectively introduced fundamental concepts such as qubits, superposition, and entanglement, and delved into technical aspects like quantum gates, algorithms, and error correction.
However, it lacked specific details in certain areas, such as the mathematical representation of qubits and the nature of quantum gates.
Gemini 2.0 Pro on the other hand, offered a more comprehensive and detailed response. It not only covered the basic concepts but also provided mathematical representations and discussed the significance of unitary matrices in quantum gates.
Additionally, it addressed various physical implementations of qubits, including superconducting circuits and trapped ions, offering a broader perspective on the current state of quantum computing technology.
Winner: Gemini Pro delivered a more in-depth and technically rich explanation, making it better suited for users seeking a deeper understanding of quantum computing concepts.
2. Creative writing
Prompt: "Write a short, engaging sci-fi story about a future where people can upload their memories to the cloud. Keep it under 500 words."
Gemini Flash presented a story with a narrative exploring themes of love, loss, and the philosophical implications of digital immortality.
It delves into Kai's internal conflict about the authenticity of a digital existence and concludes with him reuniting with a digital version of his partner, Lena, while questioning the reality of his new existence.
Gemini Pro crafted a vivid narrative set in Neo-Kyoto, following Anya as she navigates a world where memories are stored in the 'MemCloud.'
It introduces tension through the malfunctioning 'MemCloud' and the risks associated with accessing forbidden memories, culminating in a suspenseful chase that leaves readers contemplating the nature of memory and identity.
Winner: Gemini Pro provided a more immersive experience, with detailed world-building and a compelling plot that effectively conveyed the emotional and ethical complexities of memory uploading.
3. Research
Prompt: "Summarize the latest developments in AI research from the past three months."
Gemini Flash summarized key trends, including advancements in robotics, machine vision, AI in healthcare, understanding complex systems, generative AI in game development, AI and animal communication, AI's impact on the workforce, and AI model development.
While informative, the response was more general and lacked the depth and specificity found in Gemini Pro's answer.
Gemini Pro highlighted advancements in large language models (LLMs), multimodal capabilities, efficiency optimizations, extended context windows, integration with external tools, and a focus on alignment and safety.
The response was detailed and organized, offering specific examples and insights into each area.
Winner: Gemini Pro delivered a more detailed and nuanced summary of recent AI research developments, making it better suited for readers seeking an in-depth understanding of AI’s latest advancements.
4. Problem-Solving & Code Generation
Prompt: "Write a Python script that scrapes the latest headlines from a news website and saves them in a CSV file."
Gemini Flash drafted a script that not only performs the scraping task but also emphasizes best practices and user adaptability. The script is well-commented, explaining each step, which is beneficial for users who may be new to web scraping.
Flash provides an example of how to use the script with a specific news website, illustrating how users can adapt the script to their needs.
Gemini Pro also delivered a functional script. Similar to Flash, Pro's script includes error handling to manage potential issues during the scraping process.
Pro provided example CSS selectors for popular news websites like BBC, CNN, and The New York Times, offering users a starting point for their own scraping tasks.
Winner: Gemini Flash's response is more comprehensive, offering detailed guidance on adapting the script to various websites, emphasizing ethical considerations, and ensuring robust error handling.
5. Writing & Editing Assistance
Prompt: "Rewrite the paragraph I wrote as if it was writing by Taylor Swift: The life of the party and the CEO of luxury, Saffron is a little vibrant spice that turns every dish into an Insta-worthy meal. As one of the world’s most expensive spices, just a pinch of the deep, earthy flavor it provides can transform a regular dish into one that screams fancy. Whether it’s the star of a creamy risotto or the secret weapon in your jam, Saffron delivers a one-two punch of bougie magic.”
Gemini Flash response mimics Swift’s chatty, relatable tone, using phrases like “Okay, so, like,” and “Oh my god, is this a Michelin star restaurant?” The use of personification and exaggeration (“CEO of ‘luxurious’”) mirrors Swift’s flair for making objects feel like characters in her songs.
Gemini Pro maintains a polished, elevated tone, however it doesn’t fully capture Swift’s casual, whimsical storytelling style. It lacks the conversational pauses, humor, and relatability that make Taylor Swift’s lyrics and interviews so engaging.
Winner: Gemini Flash does a better job of capturing Taylor Swift’s conversational, playful, and slightly dramatic storytelling voice.
6. Real-Time Troubleshooting
Prompt: "I’m getting an error in my Excel formula: =VLOOKUP(A2, Sheet2!A:B, 2, FALSE). What’s wrong, and how do I fix it?"
Gemini Flash was helpful identifying issues and spot checking for potential issues such as misspellings, data type mismatches, non-existent values, and leading/trailing spaces. It offered a thorough response, but not as thorough as Pro.
Gemini Pro clearly defined each part of the VLOOKUP function, ensuring a solid understanding of its mechanics. It discusses potential problems and solutions after clearly defining each part of the VLOOKUP function.
Winner: Gemini Pro offered a more in-depth analysis, covering additional error types like #REF! and #VALUE!, and provided a structured debugging approach. Therefore, the Pro model delivers a more comprehensive solution to troubleshooting the VLOOKUP formula error.
7. Long-Form Content & Structuring
Prompt: "Outline a 10-minute TED Talk on the impact of AI on the future of work."
Gemini Flash offered a well-structured outline, covering similar themes without specific time allocations, allowing for flexibility in delivery.
The use of a compelling anecdote or statistic as a hook, along with the emphasis on storytelling and personal anecdotes, aligns with effective TED Talk strategies.
Gemini Pro responded with meticulously organized outline, with precise time allocations for each section, ensuring a balanced and coherent flow throughout the talk.
The inclusion of real-world examples, such as AI's role in healthcare and creative fields, adds depth and relatability.
Winner: Gemini Pro’s outline stands out due to its detailed timing breakdown, which ensures a well-paced presentation, and its specific emphasis on audience engagement techniques, such as the use of visuals and storytelling.
Final thoughts
Testing Gemini Flash vs. Gemini Pro across a range of prompts has revealed key differences in their capabilities. Gemini Pro consistently provided more in-depth, structured, and technically detailed responses, making it the better choice for tasks requiring complex reasoning, structured writing, and deep troubleshooting.
It excelled in areas like AI research summaries, technical problem-solving, and crafting well-organized presentations.
On the other hand, Gemini Flash demonstrated a more conversational and engaging style, particularly in creative writing and informal tone adaptation.
It was wittier, faster, and better at capturing personality-driven prompts, such as rewriting content in Taylor Swift’s voice. While its technical responses were solid, they tended to be slightly less comprehensive than Pro’s.
Ultimately, choosing between the two depends on your needs — if you want quick, engaging, and creative responses, Flash is a strong contender.
But if you need depth, structure, and precision, Pro is the more reliable option and you might want to consider trying a Gemini Advanced subscription to explore all that the chatbot has to offer.
More from Tom's Guide
- 7 AI hacks every woman needs to boost productivity and avoid burnout
- I just tested ChatGPT-4.5 vs ChatGPT-4o with 7 prompts — here's my verdict
- I discovered the best trivia about my favorite snacks using Gemini deep research — here’s what I learned
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
