Google Gemini Live now available to all Android users — here’s how to get access

Your articles cover topics that are of interest to me, which is generally enough to earn you a click every time. However, the one tom's guide tendency that will never earn any click of mine and may one day put me off to the extent that the years (I've been a tg reader for much, much longer than my forum handle age might suggest. Easily a decade or more, I'd wager) worth of good favor you've rightfully earned, all of it done with a respectable level of good, old fashioned journalistic integrity in a pure/natural way ("natural" insofar as far as clicks on a network connected picture box capable of delivering as many cat pics as one could ever hope and dream of at the snap of a finger 🫰🏻are concerned. Not necessarily "natural" as in "nature." If there is an Internet god or gods, natural in this context is created in their image and with their approval) could go kaput. The unfortunate tendency I speak of, of course, is the disjointed and un-flowy (that's a word, trust me. Don't bother looking it up, though. It'll be in the next Merriam-Webster) "best devices" hyperlinks. They're forced, or as the kids would say, too thirsty. Sticking with the Interweb gods motif, they're the exact opposite of "natural," completely devoid of what those gods of Tech deem from on high to be right and good (online Tech content), to be worthy and created in accordance with Journalistic Integrity (their equivalent of The Golden Rule). Outside of Tech, there is said to be "good" and "evil," or if you prefer, "light" and "dark." Yin and yang, etc.. If all that is right and good in Tech coverage is in and of the light, this tendency I speak of is the darkness, representing all that is bad and very not good.

TL;DR - it's yucky, cut it out. TG is better than yucky. "Be the change..." and all that.